The next James Bond is increasingly unlikely to be representative of the British Isles, thanks to the British intelligence services (MI5, MI6, and GCHQ) who are offering final year university students a 2025 summer internship, provided they have the good taste not to be ‘White British’:
For the 2024/25 academic year, if you’re in your final or penultimate year of university and from a Black, Asian, mixed heritage or ethnic minority background and from a socially or economically disadvantaged background*, this Internship will help you discover if a career in intelligence is right for you. You won’t just be sitting on the sidelines – this is your opportunity to get unique access to our operations, gain experience, and make key contributions to real projects.
Not all whites are equally persona non grata however, a bone is tossed to “white Other (for example, Romany Gypsy, Scottish or Irish Travellers)” and mixed-race whites, “White and Black Caribbean, White and Black African, White and Asian or any other mixed heritage” for reasons that are unclear, aside from the banal observation: “We’re confining the applications for this Internship to those within this demographic due to a current underrepresentation in our workforce.” The original job posting can be viewed here.
Would that this were an aberration, but it’s been a long time coming. Spy chiefs were reportedly clamouring for a black, female James Bond a while back, in a bid to “drive diversity.” Facts driving fiction, or the other way round? Whatever it is, the intelligence services are way behind the curve; the latest in a long line of British institutions mistaking diversity for competence.
In fact, in order to save time you’d probably be better off compiling a list of British institutions which haven’t been infected with the diversity bug. All sections of the Armed Forces have made the suicidal decision to discourage or outright ban white men from applying for positions. The BBC of course is staunchly anti-white in its hiring practice, as are large swathes of the mainstream media. The police discriminate against white applicants, whenever they think they can get away with it. Schools are being encouraged to discriminate against white teachers, while white students are routinely excluded from opportunities all the way from primary school to university level.
The only time the insatiable lust for diversity failed to materialise was the recent push for assisted dying adverts on the Tube, where whites celebrating their own untimely death were mysteriously back in demand. Make your own mind up as to why that might be.
This matters. It’s one thing for dyed-in-the-wool anglophobes like the Beeb to indulge in the exclusion of whites (and of course, equally unacceptable), but the authorities signing up to such practices is a far more sinister problem.
Demography is only moving one way in Britain, engineered deliberately by successive administrations, as Keir Starmer recently admitted. Muhammad is now officially the most popular baby name for boys in England and Wales, a fact even the Office for National Statistics can no longer deny. Of course, this has been the case for at least a decade; it’s just that the convenient 14 variants of the name (Muhammad, Mohammed, Mohammad, Muhammed, Mohamed, Mohamad, Muhamad, Muhamed, Mohamud, Mohummad, Mohummed, Mouhamed, Mohammod, and Mouhamad, if you’re curious) have allowed the statisticians to pretend that this was not so. If you believe the ONS then, various incarnations of Muhammad are the 1st, 33rd, and 68th most popular names in Britain. Alas, we are no longer a serious country.
The long-term effect of Muslim babies dominating the maternity wards has yet to be observed. What has been witnessed in the space of my lifetime, however, is the demographic transformation of the country. Whites are a minority in the capital, a minority in major cities, and will eventually be a minority across the nation (without serious course correction). The timeline for which is estimated at something like 2050, the only caveat being that however lunatic the demographic projections appear to be, they always turn out to have underestimated the speed of replacement.
The establishment customarily gerrymander the figures until the practice is untenable, at which point the mood shifts to aggressive questions as to why such an eventuality would be problematic. As a case in point, consider 2022 when Nigel Farage was roundly lambasted for the claim that “London, Birmingham and Manchester are all now minority white cities.” The BBC took him to task, as did the ONS, as indeed did the fact-checkers at Full Fact. Except Nigel Farage was not wrong, which is why Sajid Javid decided to change tack and simply said “So what?”
So what indeed, just get on with it. Except, this isn’t merely something to ‘get on with.’ Britain is one of, if not the most, tolerant societies in the world. The same is unlikely to be true of the populations it has suicidally imported in recent years. Anti-white critical race theory is being taught secretly in Britain’s schools, while anti-white government policies are the norm. Indeed, being pro-white is effectively illegal, as anything which celebrates whiteness is either investigated as a hate crime, e.g. ‘It’s OK to be white,’ and in some cases determined a jailable offence.
That white native Brits may soon be a minority in their own homeland is not nothing, however there’s no reason to speed up the process. Actively denying white Brits access to education, employment, and indeed free speech is not just immoral, it’s also no recipe for social cohesion. Furthermore, denying them access to the levers of power on the grounds that they are not sufficiently diverse, is little more than an invitation to civil war.
Reverse colonisation may currently be a joke made during after-dinner speeches, but there are those with prominent voices who would support such a policy in Britain. It’s not so long ago that these Isles were run by Rishi Sunak, Humza Yousaf, and Vaughan Gething—none of whom are now in situ. That might tell us something about our predilection for diversity, and perhaps also the invalidity of such nonsense.
